Evaluate Ancient and Modern Images and Interpretations on...

b) Evaluate ancient and modern images and interpretations of Cleopatra VII Images and interpretations of a person can change over time. Such movement is paralleled with changes in opinion and morals throughout generations. Cleopatra the seventh is subject to this fluctuation. Ancient images and interpretations differ greatly to the impression left today merely by her name. Chris Dumasis, a modern day historian amplifies this theory in ‘Interpretations of Cleopatra’. She argues, â€Å"women have been demeaned of their true substance since the early time of patriarchal society.† Taken into account, this argument entails that when studying ancient sources it must be understood that at times, only a very narrow view of the events are presented†¦show more content†¦The long nose and pointed chin are two distinct features of Cleopatra that are demonstrated by the image on the coin that sepeate her from those that play her today. In his ‘A.D. 75 Life of Antony’ Plutarch himself professes, â€Å"Her actual beauty †¦ w as not so remarkable that none could be compared with her†¦ but the contact of her presence †¦ was irresistible†. As a consequence, it can be understood that it is ancient sources that possibly provide the truest image of her, being from the period of her life. That is not to say however, that ancient sources have incorporated a complete truth. This can be seen with the evidence provided by Roman and Latin sources. In ‘An Ancient Roman Perspective’, Gemma Wilson’s account for Rome’s feelings towards the Queen is one of great hostility. According to Wilson, â€Å"at best, the Romans viewed Cleopatra with suspicion. At worst, they hated her.† Cleopatra was of coarse despised for utilizing the two public figures of Rome’s world, Caesar initially and then Mark Antony. Peter Roberts describes how it was Octavian that initiated Rome’s hatred towards Rome, relying on ‘sexual slander’ to tarnish her reputation. Many Roman poets continued this tradition of condemnation such as Lucan in ‘Pharsalia’, referring to Cleopatra as â€Å"Egypt’s shame.† Horace continues to embellish this image; â€Å"the queen, with a contaminated gang of creatures’ in his Ode XXXVII, referring to

Defying Stereotypes A Look At Gender Relations - 1689 Words

Defying Stereotypes: A Look at Gender Relations in the Classroom Cecilia Ridgway, in â€Å"Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World,† holds that gender exists as an organizing social force. We value certain stereotypes of how people of a certain gender should act and incorporate these expectations into our social relations. Men, Ridgeway explains, are typically viewed as having more â€Å"competence, assertiveness, confidence, independence, forcefulness, and dominance† (Ridgeway, 2011) in social relations. Women, on the other hand, are viewed as valuing â€Å"emotional expressiveness, nurturance, interpersonal sensitivity, kindness, and responsiveness† (Ridgeway, 2011). According to Ridgeway, these gender stereotypes are†¦show more content†¦In doing so, both genders are acting out the social attributes encouraged by gender stereotypes. She explains that the extent to which gender stereotypes impact the faces people assume rel ies on â€Å"gender’s salience, or relevance for them, given the nature of the situation† (Ridgeway, 2011). Gender stereotypes might prove salient when hiring CEOs, for example, but what about in a different setting? Through my study, I sought to understand the salience of gender in the college classroom. I observed one session of an Introduction to Sociology class at Colby College in Waterville, ME. The class had thirteen females and eleven males. The professor was female. I paid close attention to two things: first, how the students prefaced their comments during the class discussion. I expected females to qualify their comments more often by saying â€Å"I think,† or â€Å"In my opinion.† These statements seem less assertive and more fulfilling of gender stereotypes. Secondly, I noted how frequently females refuted statements made by males. This shows an assertiveness that also conflicts with gender stereotypes. The topic of the class discussion was Mi lton Friedman’s 1980 â€Å"Power of the Market† lecture. The discussion began, surprisingly, rather female dominated. A male responded to the professor’s initial question concerning Friedman, but three females offered subsequent

Celebrity Endorsement Facebook- MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: What is the rate of PORNSAK to be celebrity endorsement for Singapore Nescafe? Answer: It is expected that the endorsement rate for Pornsak would be about $4 million. It has to be said that in the recent time with the increasing popularity of the social media like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Snapchat; the endorsement is no longer depended for a single media like television endorsement or the face for print media (Money 2016). The means of endorsement has changed. It has also been evident that Pornsak is active in these social media and thus, it is expected that the rate of endorsement would include the rate for endorsing the product (Nescafe) in these platforms as well. The rate of endorsement has been estimated to be $4 million because Pornsak is not an international celebrity and he has fame in the market of Singapore and Thailand only. Thus, the rate would not be very high as $25 or $30 million like the other popular celebrities like Beyonce charges. So in order to become the celebrity face for Singapore, it is expected that Pornsak would charge $4 million. References: Money, C., 2016 10 Of the Highest Paid Celebrity Endorsement Deals Available at: https://www.therichest.com/expensive-lifestyle/money/10-of-the-highest-paid-celebrity-endorsement-deals/ [Accessed on: 3-5-2017]

Romeo And Juliet From Play To Big Screen Essays -

Romeo And Juliet: From Play To Big Screen Romeo and Juliet: From Play to Big Screen In 1596, William Shakespeare published the tragic tale of two star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet. The origins of this story are uncertain but Shakespeares chief source for his adoption of the story was from The Tragicall Historye of Romeus and Juliet, a poem by Arthur Brooke (1562). He also knew the story from Palace of Pleasure, by William Painter, which appeared in several editions prior to 1580.(Boyce 563) Shakespeares classic tale is about two young lovers caught in the crossfire of a senseless family feud.(Shakespeare 3) This feud between the two families ultimately is the cause of the two lovers untimely demise. In 1996, Baz Luhrmann produced a modern film of the classic tragedy entitled William Shakespeares Romeo + Juliet. Adding familiar images and common ideas, Luhrmann brought the classic story to modern times. Though Romeo + Juliet has many differences from the original version from Shakespeare, it supports the original characters, themes, dialogue, and key issues of th e classic tale of the star-crossed lovers. There were many differences among the two stories, among these differences were setting, weapons, the classic Balcony Scene, other new adoptions to the film, the concentration on the main characters of Romeo and Juliet, and the implementation of imagery to the storyline. First, the setting of the story is probably one of the biggest differences between the two stories. The original version of the tale is set in Verona, Italy. The newer version is set in a fictitious Verona Beach, California, a city with the appearance of modern day Los Angeles after a riot. The new environment gives familiarity to the viewer, allowing them to relate to the situation at hand, bringing it to a modern time. Another change to the story was the weapons used within the story. The original story used daggers as weapons whereas the newer version uses guns (appropriately titled sword, dagger, etc.). The famed Balcony Scene, where Romeo and Juliet avow their love to each other was dramatically changed in many aspects. In the original version, Juliet appears on the balcony and utters the famous words O Romeo, Romeo! Wherefore art thou Romeo? (Shakespeare 45) Juliet then goes into the speech about names, asking Romeo to deny his fathers name. Romeo is hiding in the shadows below and hears the words of Juliet. After hearing Juliets speech Romeo steps into the light. Romeo and Juliet profess their love for each other and they plan to get married in secrecy. This is a very romantic and heart-filled scene. The new version, on the other hand, takes place in the pool of the Capulets home. The same dialogue is spoken between the two lovers but the sexuality of the film takes away from the true romanticism of the original play. Only part of the scene takes place on the balcony. Only where Juliet is telling Romeo goodnight takes place on the balcony. This, in part, takes away from the story. Many things in the new version were changed to make the transition from old times to new. Guns, letter couri er services, cars, drugs, and policemen all replace swords, messengers, Monarchs, and the Watch. These modern elements neither take away nor add to the storyline. When the characters fight with swords in the original play, the audience understands the magnitude of the hatred between the two families. This same magnitude is conveyed when the characters fight with guns. Because the play focuses on the feuding families and the desires Romeo and Juliet have for each other, time changes, props changes, and slight dialogue, action, and scene changes does not make a substantial difference in the overall plot of the story. One aspect of the play that really bothered many Shakespeare fans was the change of the meaning of Mercutios Queen Mab speech. Mercutios long speech about Queen Mab in the original version, according to Robert Evans, presents what were the main reasons for marriage- money, place, and love- and then presents what in the milieu of Romeo and Juliet was a principle destructiv e force- violence.(Evans 79) In the new version, Mercutio is merely referring to a mood-altering drug called Ecstasy. Also,